• ▶ 2008-2024年被中国情报信息研究所评价中心评为“中国科技核心期刊”
  • ▶ 2019-2024年连续三届被中国科学院文献情报中心中国科学引文数据库CSCD(核心库)收录
  • ▶ 2021、2023年入编北京大学图书馆《中文核心期刊要目总览》
  • ▶ 2020-2024连续四年入选《科技期刊世界影响力指数(WJCI)报告》
陈义忠, 贺鹏明, 张思思, 刘梓腾, 彭 贺.水资源利用视角下绿色发展门槛效应及其空间异质性——以长江经济带三大城市群为例水资源与水工程学报[J].,2025,36(1):105-117
水资源利用视角下绿色发展门槛效应及其空间异质性——以长江经济带三大城市群为例
Green development threshold effect and its spatial heterogeneity from the perspective of water resources utilization: A case study of three urban agglomerations in the Yangtze River Economic Belt
  
DOI:10.11705/j.issn.1672-643X.2025.01.12
中文关键词:  绿色发展  水资源生态足迹  产业集聚  门槛效应  长江经济带
英文关键词:green development  water resources ecological footprint  industrial agglomeration  threshold effect  the Yangtze River Economic Belt
基金项目:国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(42107479);河北省优秀青年基金项目(D2024202007)
作者单位
陈义忠1, 贺鹏明1, 张思思1, 刘梓腾1, 彭 贺2 (1. 河北工业大学 经济管理学院 天津 300401 2.北京工业大学 循环经济研究院 北京 100124) 
摘要点击次数: 185
全文下载次数: 126
中文摘要:
      明晰绿色发展的空间分异特征与响应机制是实现长江经济带三大城市群协同发展的关键环节。通过构建绿色发展云模型和水资源生态足迹模型探究2000—2025年三大城市群绿色发展与水资源利用格局的时空特征,在此基础上从水资源利用视角实证产业集聚对绿色发展的门槛效应及空间异质性,并提出差异化发展策略。结果表明:三大城市群体(除遂宁市、孝感市外)绿色发展均达到中等及以上水平,水资源生态足迹有所增长,污水足迹占比呈现出“东西高中间低”的空间分布特征;三大城市群绿色发展水平门槛效应存在较大的空间异质性,协同集聚对长江经济带绿色发展的影响持续提升;成渝城市群生产性服务业集聚在水资源生态足迹超过0.379 hm2/人时,对绿色发展转变为抑制效应,重庆市协同集聚具有显著的提升效应;在各集聚水平下,对长江中游城市群绿色发展均呈现“倒V型”的关系,鄂州市等工业城市协同集聚对绿色发展具有抑制作用;长三角城市群均具有双门槛效应,制造业集聚在水资源生态足迹到达第二门槛值后,对绿色发展正效应最高(0.272)。
英文摘要:
      Clarifying the spatial differentiation characteristics and response mechanism of green development is a key link in achieving the coordinated development of three major urban agglomerations in the Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB). This study proposed a cloud model-based green development evaluation framework and a water resources ecological footprint model to explore the spatial-temporal characteristics of green development and water resources utilization pattern in the three urban agglomerations from 2000 to 2025. On this basis, the threshold effect of industrial agglomeration on regional green development and its spatial heterogeneity were investigated from the perspective of water resources utilization, and differentiated development strategies were further proposed. The results showed that the green development level of cities in the three urban agglomerations all reached a moderate level and above, except Suining and Xiaogan. Water resources ecological footprint presented an increasing trend, and the proportion of sewage footprint exhibited a spatial pattern of “high in the east and west but low in the center”e. There was a large spatial heterogeneity in threshold effect of green development level in the three urban agglomerations, and the impact of co-agglomeration on green development of the YREB continued to increase. When water resources ecological footprint exceeded 0.379 hm2/cap, the impact of producer service agglomeration of the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration has an inhibitory effect on green development, and the promotive effect of co-agglomeration in Chongqing was the most evident. Different agglomeration modes all presented an inverted “V” relationship with green development in the midstream urban agglomeration. The co-agglomeration of industrial cities (such as Ezhou) had an inhibitory effect on green development. Green development level in the Delta urban agglomeration had a double threshold effect; manufacturing agglomeration had the highest positive effect on green development (0.272) after water resources ecological footprint reached the second threshold value.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭