• ▶ 2008-2024年被中国情报信息研究所评价中心评为“中国科技核心期刊”
  • ▶ 2019-2024年连续三届被中国科学院文献情报中心中国科学引文数据库CSCD(核心库)收录
  • ▶ 2021、2023年入编北京大学图书馆《中文核心期刊要目总览》
  • ▶ 2020-2024连续四年入选《科技期刊世界影响力指数(WJCI)报告》
王中浩,马 飞,林智晟.某水电站琴键堰体型优化试验研究水资源与水工程学报[J].,2024,35(1):109-116
某水电站琴键堰体型优化试验研究
Structural optimization of Piano Key Weirs in a hydropower station
  
DOI:10.11705/j.issn.1672-643X.2024.01.13
中文关键词:  琴键堰  体型优化  泄流能力  展宽比  堰高  比尺效应
英文关键词:Piano Key Weir (PKW)  structural optimization  discharge capacity  length to width ratio  weir height  scale effect
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(522035811)
作者单位
王中浩,马 飞,林智晟 (河海大学 水利水电学院 江苏 南京 210098) 
摘要点击次数: 785
全文下载次数: 306
中文摘要:
      琴键堰是一种新型的高效溢流堰,以曲折的堰顶结构来增加溢流前缘总长度,使得其泄流能力远超直线堰。针对某拟建水电站琴键堰泄流能力不足的问题,提出了增加展宽比(L/W)、增加堰高(P)和增加堰高且减少单元数(n)的优化方案,并通过物理模型试验进行验证,得到了满足设计要求的推荐方案。此外,本研究还探讨了水工模型类别(整体及断面模型)和比尺效应对琴键堰泄流能力的影响。通过对比分析优化方案可知:方案M1(展宽比L/W由7.75增至8.88)中,琴键堰泄流能力得到了一定程度的提高,但泄流能力仍不满足设计要求;方案M2(堰高由4.50 m增至6.50 m)和M3(堰高由4.50 m增至6.90 m,单元数由17.5个减至8.5个)中,琴键堰泄流能力显著增加,该两种方案皆可满足设计要求。试验结果表明:与琴键堰整体模型相比,其断面模型测得的泄流能力偏大约6%;对于琴键堰,当模型堰上水头大于2.50 cm时,比尺效应对琴键堰泄流能力的影响可以忽略。
英文摘要:
      The Piano Key Weir (PKW), a novel weir, improves the discharge capacity greatly compared to the linear weir with its prolonged nonlinear overflow edge. To address the problem of insufficient discharge capacity of PKW in a proposed hydropower station, the optimized schemes of increasing the length to width ratio L/W, increasing the weir height P and decreasing the number of weir units n as well as increasing the weir height P were proposed. Then, physical model tests were conducted to obtain the optimal schemes that meet the design requirements. Besides, the influence of hydraulic model types (including overall model and cross-section model) and the scale effect of different schemes on the discharge capacity of PKW was investigated. The results demonstrate that the discharge capacity of PKW was improved to some extent but yet did not meet the design requirements in scheme M1 (L/W increased from 7.75 to 8.88); the discharge capacity increased significantly in both scheme M2 (P increased from 4.50 m to 6.50 m) and M3 (P increased from 4.50 m to 6.90 m and n decreased from 17.5 to 8.5), which met the design requirements. Additionally, the discharge capacity of the cross-section model was slightly higher than that of the overall model by about 6%, and the scale effect could be ignored when the weir head exceeded 2.50 cm in the experiments.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭