• ▶ 2008-2024年被中国情报信息研究所评价中心评为“中国科技核心期刊”
  • ▶ 2019-2024年连续三届被中国科学院文献情报中心中国科学引文数据库CSCD(核心库)收录
  • ▶ 2021、2023年入编北京大学图书馆《中文核心期刊要目总览》
  • ▶ 2020-2024连续四年入选《科技期刊世界影响力指数(WJCI)报告》
阿垦里白·木赛, 李丰琇, 艾鹏睿, 马英杰, 付秋萍,田 敏, 阿布都卡依木·阿布力米提.铺设长度及入口压力交互作用对小流量滴灌带灌水均匀度的影响水资源与水工程学报[J].,2023,34(4):217-224
铺设长度及入口压力交互作用对小流量滴灌带灌水均匀度的影响
Effect of the interaction between laying length and inlet pressure on irrigation uniformity of the small flow drip irrigation belt
  
DOI:10.11705/j.issn.1672-643X.2023.04.26
中文关键词:  滴灌  小流量滴灌带  灌水均匀度  铺设长度  入口压力
英文关键词:drip irrigation  imported low-discharge drip irrigation belt  irrigation uniformity  laying length  inlet pressure
基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目(2021YFD1900804-04);自治区重点研发专项项目(202107331);机采长绒棉水肥高效利用技术研究及示范项目(20210101);自治区重大科技专项项目(2020A01002-2)
作者单位
阿垦里白·木赛1,2, 李丰琇1,2, 艾鹏睿1,2, 马英杰1,2, 付秋萍1,2,田 敏1,2, 阿布都卡依木·阿布力米提3 (1. 新疆农业大学 水利与土木工程学院 新疆 乌鲁木齐 830052 2.新疆水利工程安全与水灾害防治自治区重点实验室 新疆 乌鲁木齐 830052 3.新疆中农智水科技有限公司 新疆 昌吉 831100 ) 
摘要点击次数: 1055
全文下载次数: 546
中文摘要:
      为探究滴灌带铺设长度与入口压力交互作用对灌水均匀度的影响。以3种J型(进口型号)滴灌带和1种G型(国产型号)滴灌带为研究对象,分别对不同铺设长度和入口压力组合下的滴头流量进行测定,并运用变差系数(v)、Christiansen均匀系数(Cu)及Keller均匀系数(Eu)进行了评价。结果表明:Cv、Cu、Eu均随着滴灌带铺设长度和入口压力的变化而变化,Cu与Eu呈正相关,与Cv呈负相关;以滴水孔流量变差系数Cv为判别指标,滴灌带铺设长度为200 m时,J1型入口压力为5~11 m、J2型入口压力为3~11 m的滴灌带质量等级均为A(优);入口压力在1~11 m范围时,J3型滴灌带在各压力下的质量等级均为B(良)、G型滴灌带质量等级均为D(不合格)。滴灌带铺设长度为100 m时,J型滴灌带入口压力在1~11 m范围的质量等级均为A(优);G型入口压力在1~3 m时滴灌带质量等级为C(一般)。以均匀系数Eu和Cu为判别指标,J型滴灌带铺设长度为300 m时灌水均匀度均最低,入口压力为9~11 m时灌水均匀度均最高。基于上述判别指标,本试验所选各类型滴灌带铺设长度和入口压力的最佳搭配为:J1型滴灌带铺设长度200 m、入口压力9 m;J2型滴灌带铺设长度200 m、入口压力11 m;J3型滴灌带铺设长度200 m、入口压力11 m;G型滴灌带铺设长度100 m,入口压力7 m。
英文摘要:
      In order to explore the influence of the interaction between the laying length of drip irrigation belt and inlet pressure on the irrigation uniformity, three J-type (imported) drip irrigation belts and one G-type (made in China) drip irrigation belt were laid for the study of drip flow under different laying lengths and inlet pressure combinations. Then, the indices of Christiansen uniformity coefficient (Cu), variation coefficient (Cv) and Keller uniformity coefficient (Eu) were used to evaluate the drip irrigation belts. Experimental results show that Cv, Cu and Eu all change with the inlet pressure and laying length, Cu is positively correlated with Eu , but negatively correlated with Cv. With Cv as the discrimination index, when the laying length is 200 m, the inlet pressure of J1-type ranges from 5 to 11 m, and that of J2-type ranges from 3 to 11 m, the quality of the drip irrigation belt can reach A (excellent); the quality of J3-type is B (good) and G-type is D (unqualified) when the inlet pressure fall in the range of 1-11 m. When the laying length is 100 m, the quality of J-type drip irrigation belt is A (excellent) under the inlet pressure of 1-11 m; G-type is C (general) under the inlet pressure of 1-3 m. With the uniformity coefficient Eu and Cu as the discriminant indices, the irrigation uniformity of J-type drip irrigation belt is the lowest when the laying length is 300 m, and it is the highest when the inlet pressure is 9-11 m. Based on the above criteria, the optimal combination of laying length and inlet pressure of different drip irrigation belts are as follows: the length is 200 m, the inlet pressure is 9 m for J1-type drip irrigation belt; the length is 200 m, the inlet pressure is 11 m for J2-type and J3-type drip irrigation belt; the length is 100 m, the inlet pressure is 7 m for G-type drip irrigation belt.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭