• ▶ 2008-2024年被中国情报信息研究所评价中心评为“中国科技核心期刊”
  • ▶ 2019-2024年连续三届被中国科学院文献情报中心中国科学引文数据库CSCD(核心库)收录
  • ▶ 2021、2023年入编北京大学图书馆《中文核心期刊要目总览》
  • ▶ 2020-2024连续四年入选《科技期刊世界影响力指数(WJCI)报告》
王 梅, 秦于晴, 左其亭, 陈文鹏, 吴佩鹏.黄河水质与沿线城市社会适应能力耦合协调分析水资源与水工程学报[J].,2022,33(6):1-9
黄河水质与沿线城市社会适应能力耦合协调分析
Coupling coordination analysis between river water quality and social adaptability of cities along the Yellow River
  
DOI:10.11705/j.issn.1672-643X.2022.06.01
中文关键词:  黄河水质  沿黄城市  社会适应能力  耦合协调  主成分分析  污染分担率
英文关键词:the Yellow River water quality  cities along the Yellow River  social adaptability  coupling coordination  principal component analysis  pollution sharing rate
基金项目:河南省重点研发与推广专项(科技攻关)项目(192102310248); 国家自然科学基金项目(42102286); 国家重点研发计划课题(2021YFC3200201)
作者单位
王 梅1,2, 秦于晴1, 左其亭1,2, 陈文鹏3, 吴佩鹏1,2 (1.郑州大学 水利与土木工程学院 河南 郑州 450001 2.郑州大学 黄河生态保护与区域协调发展研究院 河南 郑州 450001 3.中国环境监测总站 北京 100012) 
摘要点击次数: 1759
全文下载次数: 537
中文摘要:
      通过建立黄河水质与社会适应能力评价指标体系,结合主成分分析法和熵权法,定量揭示2012-2019年黄河沿线11个城市的黄河水质与社会适应能力的演变趋势,并对两者的耦合协调发展态势进行了分析。结果表明:研究区内多数城市黄河水质多年平均状况良好,仅运城市和呼和浩特市河段水质较差,以营养物和有机物污染为主;多数城市社会适应能力呈波动上升趋势,运城市则稳定在最低水平,菏泽市次之,经济支撑薄弱是两城市低社会适应水平的主因;城市黄河水质与社会适应能力两系统整体处于良好耦合、中级协调状态,黄河水质整体上具备承载沿线城市经济社会发展的潜能,但社会适应能力系统应对黄河水环境恶化所能产生的社会修复稍有欠缺;菏泽市、呼和浩特市和银川市处于初级协调状态,运城市处于勉强协调状态,两系统间存在单向乃至双向约束。
英文摘要:
      On the basis of the established evaluation index systems for the Yellow River (YR) water quality and city social adaptability, the principal component analysis method combined with entropy weight method was applied to quantitatively reveal the evolution trend of the YR water quality and social adaptability of 11 cities along the YR from 2012 to 2019, and the coupling coordination trend of the two was analyzed. The results showed that the multiyear average YR water quality in most cities in the study area was generally good, except Yuncheng and Hohhot, which lagged behind by nutrient and organic pollution primarily. The social adaptability of most cities showed a fluctuating upward trend, Yuncheng was stable at the lowest level, followed by Heze, and weak economic support was found to be the main reason for the low-level social adaptability of both cities. The two systems, i.e., water quality and social adaptability, were generally in good coupling and intermediate coordinated state, and the YR water quality system had the potential to carry the social and economic development of the cities along the YR, but the social adaptability system fell short in generating enough social restoration in response to the potential water environment deterioration of the YR. Heze, Hohhot and Yinchuan were primarily coordinated, Yuncheng was barely coordinated, and there existed one-way or even two-way constraints between the two systems.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭