• ▶ 2008-2024年被中国情报信息研究所评价中心评为“中国科技核心期刊”
  • ▶ 2019-2024年连续三届被中国科学院文献情报中心中国科学引文数据库CSCD(核心库)收录
  • ▶ 2021、2023年入编北京大学图书馆《中文核心期刊要目总览》
  • ▶ 2020-2024连续四年入选《科技期刊世界影响力指数(WJCI)报告》
张 羽, 左其亭, 曹宏斌, 白西杰, 杨振龙.沁蟒河流域水资源生态足迹时空变化特征及均衡性分析水资源与水工程学报[J].,2022,33(3):50-57
沁蟒河流域水资源生态足迹时空变化特征及均衡性分析
Spatio-temporal variation characteristics and equilibrium analysis of water resources ecological footprint in the Qinmang River Basin
  
DOI:10.11705/j.issn.1672-643X.2022.03.07
中文关键词:  水资源生态足迹  时空变化特征  泰尔指数  空间均衡性  沁蟒河流域
英文关键词:water resources ecological footprint(WEF)  spatio-temporal variation characteristics  Theil index  spatial equilibrium  the Qinmang River Basin
基金项目:河南省水利科技攻关计划项目(GG201947); 河南省重大公益性项目(2020-36); 国家重点研发计划课题(2021YFC3200201); 郑州大学青年教师培育基金项目(JC202042037)
作者单位
张 羽1, 左其亭1, 曹宏斌2, 白西杰3, 杨振龙1 (1.郑州大学 水利科学与工程学院 河南 郑州 450001 2.河南省豫北水利工程管理局河南 新乡 453002 3.河南水投小浪底北岸灌区工程有限公司 河南 郑州 450004) 
摘要点击次数: 1106
全文下载次数: 389
中文摘要:
      沁蟒河流域作为黄河流域重要的能源、化工产业基地,水资源供需矛盾尤为突出。因此,利用生态足迹理论对沁蟒河流域水资源可持续利用状况进行评估,并对其进行均衡性分析,能够为黄河流域生态保护和高质量发展重大国家战略的实施提供范例。采用水资源生态足迹模型计算沁蟒河流域各地级行政区水资源生态足迹,并利用泰尔指数对沁蟒河流域2010-2019年水资源生态足迹的均衡性进行分析。结果表明:沁蟒河流域5个地级行政区在水资源生态足迹方面存在一定差异,其中河南省的2个地级行政区相对较大,山西省的3个地级行政区相对较小;各地级行政区均处于“生态赤字”状态,农业生态足迹的不均衡性较大,组内差异逐渐超过组间差异成为影响沁蟒河流域水资源生态足迹均衡性的主要因素。总体而言,沁蟒河流域水资源生态状况较差。
英文摘要:
      As an important energy and chemical industry base of the Yellow River Basin, the Qinmang River Basin is facing a prominent contradiction between the supply and demand of water resources. In the hope of providing an exemplary case study for the implementation of the major national strategy of ecological conservation and high-quality development of the Yellow River Basin, we evaluated the sustainable utilization of water resources in the Qinmang River Basin using the ecological footprint theory and conducted an equilibrium analysis of water resources ecological footprint (WEF) of the basin. The water resources ecological footprint model was used to calculate the WEF of various administrative regions in the Qinmang River Basin, and Theil index was used to analyze their equilibrium status from 2010 to 2019. The results show that there were some differences in the WEF in the five prefecture-level administrative regions of the Qinmang River Basin, among which the WEF in two of the regions were relatively large, and the rest three were small. All the administrative regions were in ecological deficit, and the disequilibrium of agricultural ecological footprint was more prominent. The differences within each individual group gradually exceeded the differences between groups and became the main factor affecting the equilibrium of WEF in the basin. On the whole, the ecological condition of water resources in the Qinmang River Basin was poor during the study period.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭