• ▶ 2008-2024年被中国情报信息研究所评价中心评为“中国科技核心期刊”
  • ▶ 2019-2024年连续三届被中国科学院文献情报中心中国科学引文数据库CSCD(核心库)收录
  • ▶ 2021、2023年入编北京大学图书馆《中文核心期刊要目总览》
  • ▶ 2020-2024连续四年入选《科技期刊世界影响力指数(WJCI)报告》
陈 燕, 许遐祯, 孙佳丽, 苗 茜, 王国庆.降雨控制模式对海绵城市设计参数的影响——以江苏省为例水资源与水工程学报[J].,2021,32(4):15-23
降雨控制模式对海绵城市设计参数的影响——以江苏省为例
Influence of rainfall control method on the design of sponge cityconstruction: A case study of Jiangsu Province
  
DOI:10.11705/j.issn.1672-643X.2021.04.03
中文关键词:  低影响开发  设计雨量  初期雨量  最优控制率  海绵城市  江苏省
英文关键词:low impact development(LID)  designed rainfall depth  initial rainfall  optimal control rate  sponge city  Jiangshu Province
基金项目:国家重点研发计划课题(2017YFA0605002、2017YFC1502701);国家自然科学基金项目(51779144);中国气象局气候变化专项(CCSF201932)
作者单位
陈 燕1, 许遐祯1, 孙佳丽1, 苗 茜1, 王国庆2,3,4 (1.江苏省气候中心江苏 南京 210008
2.南京水利科学研究院 水文水资源与水利工程科学国家重点实验室 江苏 南京 210029
3.水利部应对气候变化研究中心江苏 南京 210029
4.长江保护与绿色发展研究院 江苏 南京 210098) 
摘要点击次数: 1001
全文下载次数: 467
中文摘要:
      为了研究降雨控制模式对低影响开发系统设计参数的影响,以江苏省为例,利用全省70个国家气象站、1961-2019年的降水资料开展分析。结果表明:在相同的控制率之下,降雨总量控制模式的日设计雨量大于降雨场次控制模式的日设计雨量,在暴雨占比较高的地区更加明显,且两种控制模式的日设计雨量差值随着控制率的增大而增加;两种控制模式的日设计雨量有一定的比例关系,85%降雨总量控制率和90%降雨场次控制率的日设计雨量比值为1.08;初期雨量控制率的空间分布形态差异较大,降雨总量控制模式下的控制率由南向北逐渐减小,分布规律明显,降雨场次控制模式的控制率分布比较复杂;强降水的比例越大,两种控制模式之间的设计雨量、初期雨量控制率、最优控制率、最优设计雨量的差异越大。
英文摘要:
      To study the influence of different rainfall control methods on the design parameters of the low impact development (LID) system, a case study of Jiangsu Province was carried out. The precipitation data of 70 national meteorological stations from 1961 to 2019 are used for the analysis. The results show that under the same control rate, the designed daily rainfall depth under the mode of volume capture ratio of annual rainfall is greater than that under the mode of event capture ratio of annual rainfall, which is more so in areas with more heavy rains. Moreover the difference increases with the increase of the control rate. Also, the designed rainfall depth of the two rainfall control methods are proportional. The ratio of designed rainfall depth corresponding to 85% volume capture ratio of annual rainfall and that corresponding to 90% event capture ratio of annual rainfall is 1.08. However, the spatial distribution of the initial rainfall control rate of the two rainfall control methods is quite different. The initial rainfall control rate of volume capture ratio of annual rainfall decreases from south to north, with an obvious distribution pattern, whereas that of event capture ratio of annual rainfall is more complicated. The higher the proportion of heavy precipitation, the greater the differences between the two rainfall control methods in aspects of designed rainfall depth, initial rainfall control rate, optimal control rate and optimal designed rainfall.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭