• ▶ 2008-2024年被中国情报信息研究所评价中心评为“中国科技核心期刊”
  • ▶ 2019-2024年连续三届被中国科学院文献情报中心中国科学引文数据库CSCD(核心库)收录
  • ▶ 2021、2023年入编北京大学图书馆《中文核心期刊要目总览》
  • ▶ 2020-2024连续四年入选《科技期刊世界影响力指数(WJCI)报告》
徐建荣, 彭 育, 辜晋德, 王 宇, 章道生.平底型与反拱型水垫塘动水荷载对比试验研究水资源与水工程学报[J].,2021,32(1):131-135
平底型与反拱型水垫塘动水荷载对比试验研究
Comparison of hydrodynamic load characteristics between flat and inverted arch plunge pools
  
DOI:10.11705/j.issn.1672-643X.2021.01.19
中文关键词:  水工模型试验  平底型水垫塘  反拱型水垫塘  动水荷载
英文关键词:hydraulic model test  flat bottom plunge pool  inverted arch plunge pool  hydrodynamic load
基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0401705); 中国博士后科学基金项目(2019M661883); 南京水利科学研究院院基金项目(Y120008)
作者单位
徐建荣1, 彭 育1, 辜晋德2, 王 宇2, 章道生3 (1.中国电建集团 华东勘测设计研究院有限公司浙江 杭州311122
2.南京水利科学研究院 水文水资源与水利工程科学国家重点实验室
江苏 南京210029 3.南京市水利规划设计院股份有限公司 江苏 南京 210006) 
摘要点击次数: 1148
全文下载次数: 462
中文摘要:
      水垫塘结构是影响高坝泄洪消能的关键,优化水垫塘底板型式对有效地增加底板稳定性和减小动水荷载至关重要。平底型和反拱型底板作为两种常见的水垫塘结构型式被业界广泛采用,但关于两者的动水荷载特性对比研究尚不多见。基于白鹤滩水电站1∶50整体模型,采用物理模型试验的方法对比了平底型和反拱型水垫塘在时均压强和脉动压强方面的特性。结果表明:反拱型水垫塘底板的时均压强峰值小于平底型,来流方向上反拱型水垫塘底板的时均压强低谷值小于平底型;两种型式水垫塘脉动压强峰值差异较小,反拱型底板整体脉动压强大于平底型,但反拱型脉动压强梯度小于平底型。
英文摘要:
      The structure of plunge pool is a key factor influencing energy dissipation of high dams, and the optimization of bottom plate type is crucial to effectively increasing the stability of the bottom plate and decreasing hydrodynamic load. Flat bottom and inverted arch types are widely used as two common plunge pools; however, the comparative study of hydrodynamic load characteristics between these types is rare. Based on the 1∶50 integral model of Baihetan Hydropower Station, the characteristics of average pressure and fluctuating pressure of flat and inverted arch plunge pools are compared using physical model test. The results show that the peak value of average pressure of inverted arch is smaller than that of flat bottom, so is the lowest value in flow direction. The difference of peak values of fluctuating pressure is negligible. The overall pressure fluctuation of inverted arch is larger than that of flat bottom; however, the gradient of the fluctuating pressure of inverted arch is smaller than that of flat bottom.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭