• ▶ 2008-2024年被中国情报信息研究所评价中心评为“中国科技核心期刊”
  • ▶ 2019-2024年连续三届被中国科学院文献情报中心中国科学引文数据库CSCD(核心库)收录
  • ▶ 2021、2023年入编北京大学图书馆《中文核心期刊要目总览》
  • ▶ 2020-2024连续四年入选《科技期刊世界影响力指数(WJCI)报告》
李唱唱, 侍克斌, 姜海波.深埋高地应力引水隧洞节理围岩稳定性研究水资源与水工程学报[J].,2020,31(2):219-224
深埋高地应力引水隧洞节理围岩稳定性研究
Study on stability of jointed surrounding rock of a deep-lying diversion tunnel with high ground stress
  
DOI:10.11705/j.issn.1672-643X.2020.02.33
中文关键词:  深埋引水隧洞  高地应力  节理岩体  塑性区  稳定性  水压致裂法  三维水压致裂法
英文关键词:deep-lying diversion tunnel  high ground stress  jointed rock mass  plastic zone  stability  hydraulic fracturing method  three-dimensional hydraulic fracturing method
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(51769031) ;石河子大学青年创新人才培育计划(CXRC201804)
作者单位
李唱唱1, 侍克斌2, 姜海波1 (1. 石河子大学 水利建筑工程学院 新疆 石河子 832000 2.新疆农业大学 水利与土木工程学院 新疆 乌鲁木齐 830052) 
摘要点击次数: 1041
全文下载次数: 439
中文摘要:
      在深埋隧洞开挖过程中,高地应力和结构面发育是控制洞室围岩稳定的关键问题。针对深埋高地应力引水隧洞节理围岩稳定问题,以新疆某深埋高地应力引水隧洞为工程依托,利用水压致裂法和三维水压致裂法对地应力进行现场监测与分析,采用离散元软件3DEC模拟围岩应力场、塑性区以及位移场的变化情况,研究了深埋高地应力下引水隧洞节理围岩的稳定性问题。结果表明:实测得最大主应力在12.4~12.9 MPa范围内,模拟得洞室附近出现0~2.1 m的塑性区,最大位移值为25.1 mm,最大压应力为13.2 MPa,最大拉应力为1.32 MPa,洞室的侧墙和拱底部位的塑性区、位移值较大且出现局部小范围拉应力。结合本文具体工况和实测地应力资料,通过强度理论的方法进行岩爆分析研究,由Russenes岩爆判别式得无岩爆发生,节理岩体处于稳定状态,但随节理裂隙发育,侧墙和拱底易出现破坏,建议采用2.5 m锚杆进行加固。模拟结果与实测结果较为一致,研究成果为工程施工提供参考。
英文摘要:
      High ground stress and structural plane development are the key issues in controlling the stability of the surrounding rock mass of caverns in the process of excavating deep tunnels. Aiming at solving the stability problems of rock mass surrounding the deep-lying and high-stress hydraulic diversion tunnels, we used hydraulic fracturing method and three-dimensional hydraulic fracturing method to monitor and analyze the ground stress of a deep-lying high-stress tunnel project of a power station in Xinjiang. The discrete element software 3DEC was used to simulate the variations of stress field, the plastic zone and the displacement field of the surrounding rock mass, in order to study the stability of the rock mass. The results showed that the measured maximum principal stress was in the range of 12.4-12.9 MPa. The numerical simulation showed a plastic zone of 0-2.1 m near the cavity. The maximum displacement was 25.1 mm, the maximum compressive stress was 13.2 MPa, and the maximum tensile stress was 1.32 MPa. The displacement value was large and small localized tensile stress occurred in the plastic zone of the side wall and the bottom of the arch. Combined with the specific working conditions and measured geostress data, the rockburst analysis was carried out by the strength theory method, no rockburst occurred by the Russenes rockburst discriminant, and the jointed rock mass was in a stable state. However, with the development of joint fissures, the side wall and the arch bottom were prone to damage. It is recommended to use 2.5 m anchors for reinforcement. The simulation results are consistent with the measured data, and the research results can provide reference for engineering constructions.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭