• ▶ 2008-2024年被中国情报信息研究所评价中心评为“中国科技核心期刊”
  • ▶ 2019-2024年连续三届被中国科学院文献情报中心中国科学引文数据库CSCD(核心库)收录
  • ▶ 2021、2023年入编北京大学图书馆《中文核心期刊要目总览》
  • ▶ 2020-2024连续四年入选《科技期刊世界影响力指数(WJCI)报告》
李祥蓉, 崔东文.静电放电算法-投影寻踪融合模型及其在水质综合评价中的应用水资源与水工程学报[J].,2019,30(6):96-101
静电放电算法-投影寻踪融合模型及其在水质综合评价中的应用
Application of electrostatic discharge algorithm-projection pursuit fusion model in water quality assessment
  
DOI:10.11705/j.issn.1672-643X.2019.06.15
中文关键词:  静电放电算法  投影寻踪  水质评价  仿真验证  盘龙河
英文关键词:electrostatic discharge algorithm  projection pursuit  water quality assessment  simulation verification  Panlong River
基金项目:
作者单位
李祥蓉1, 崔东文2 (1.云南省水文水资源局文山分局 云南 文山 663000 2.云南省文山州水务局 云南 文山 663000) 
摘要点击次数: 1183
全文下载次数: 485
中文摘要:
      为拓展智能算法与投影寻踪(PP)融合模型在水质综合评价中应用,介绍一种新型群体智能算法——静电放电算法(ESDA),选取6个典型测试函数对ESDA进行仿真验证,并与当前寻优效果较好的教学优化(TLBO)算法、灰狼优化(GWO)算法和鲸鱼优化算法(WOA)的仿真结果进行对比。构建ESDA-PP评价模型,以文山州盘龙河干流4个断面2015-2017年共30个月水功能区水质综合评价为例进行实例研究。结果表明:ESDA寻优精度远优于TLBO、GWO、WOA,具有出色的寻优精度和全局搜索能力。ESDA-PP模型对实例天生桥、灰土寨、花桥和天保大桥断面水质综合评价达标率分别为93.3%、83.3%、83.3%和100%,能满足或基本满足水功能区水质保护目标要求。天生桥、灰土寨、花桥断面枯水期水质总体上优于丰水期,面源污染是主导因素;天保大桥断面丰水期水质总体上优于枯水期,点源污染是主导因素。
英文摘要:
      In order to expand the application of intelligent algorithm and projection pursuit (PP) fusion model in comprehensive evaluation of water quality, a new group intelligence algorithm-electrostatic discharge algorithm (ESDA) was introduced. Six typical test functions were selected to simulate and verify the ESDA. The simulation results of the current optimization teaching and learning optimization (TLBO) algorithm, the gray wolf optimization (GWO) algorithm and the whale optimization algorithm (WOA) were compared. The ESDA-PP evaluation model was constructed. The water quality evaluation of the water function area of the four sections of the Panlong River in Wenshan Prefecture from 2015 to 2017 was carried out as an example. The results showed that the accuracy of ESDA optimization is much better than that of TLBO, GWO and WOA, and it has excellent optimization precision and global search ability. The ESDA-PP model has a comprehensive evaluation rate of 93.3%, 83.3%, 83.3% and 100% for the water quality of the Tianshengqiao, Lishizhai, Huaqiao and Tianbao Bridges, respectively, which can meet or basically meet the water quality protection target requirements of the water function area. The water quality of Tianshengqiao, Lituzhai and Huaqiao in the dry season is generally better than that in the flood season, and the non-point source pollution is the dominant factor. The water quality of Tianbao Bridge during the flood season is generally better than the dry season, and point source pollution is the dominant factor.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭