• (1)2008-2022年连续15年年被中国情报信息研究所评价中心评为“中国科技核心期刊”
  • (2)2019-2024年连续三届被中国科学院文献情报中心中国科学引文数据库CSCD(核心库)收录
  • (3)2021年入编北京大学图书馆《中文核心期刊要目总览》2020年版
  • (4)2020-2022连续三年入选《科技期刊世界影响力指数(WJCI)报告》
贾鼎元, 向 茂, 赵运铎.基于组合赋权-向量夹角余弦的绿色施工节水措施综合效益评价水资源与水工程学报[J].,2018,29(4):182-187
基于组合赋权-向量夹角余弦的绿色施工节水措施综合效益评价
Comprehensive benefit evaluation of green construction water saving measures based on combination weighting and vector inclusion cosine
  
DOI:10.11705/j.issn.1672-643X.2018.04.31
中文关键词:  节水措施  综合效益  组合赋权  向量夹角余弦  敏感性系数  绿色施工
英文关键词:water saving measure  comprehensive benefits  combination weighting  vector inclusion cosine  sensitivity coefficient  green construction
基金项目:
作者单位
贾鼎元, 向 茂, 赵运铎 (兰州交通大学 土木工程学院 甘肃 兰州 730070) 
摘要点击次数: 1100
全文下载次数: 529
中文摘要:
      针对目前绿色施工节水措施效益评价的局限性,提出基于组合赋权-向量夹角余弦模型的绿色施工节水措施综合效益的评价方法。首先,鉴于绿色施工中对节水措施宏观效益评价的不足,选择从节水措施综合效益的角度出发,即社会、经济、生态及技术效益4个方面,建立健全节水措施综合效益评价指标体系。然后提出运用组合赋权-向量夹角余弦方法对节水措施综合效益进行评价,该方法不仅能降低主客观因素对评价结果的影响,还能根据样本加权特征值矩阵的分布偏差程度对节水措施作出直接地客观评价与决策,大大提高了决策的效率。最后,运用该方法对某文献实例中的5项节水措施综合效益进行评价,并将评价结果与TOPSIS-熵权决策法的结果进行对比,发现两者结果吻合性良好,验证了其可靠性,为指导决策者因地制宜地选择高效节水措施提供参考。
英文摘要:
      Aiming at solving the limitations of current green construction water saving measures, a comprehensive evaluation method for green construction water saving measures based on combined weight-vector angle cosine model is proposed. First, in view of the lack of macro-efficiency evaluation of water-saving measures in green construction, we chose to proceed from the perspective of the comprehensive benefits (i.e. social, economic, ecological, and technological benefits) of water-saving measures, and established a sound evaluation index system for comprehensive benefits of water-saving measures. Then, the comprehensive benefit of water-saving measures was evaluated using the combination weight-vector angle cosine method, which can not only reduce the influence of subjective and objective factors on the evaluation results, but also save water according to the distribution deviation degree of the sample weighted eigenvalue matrix. Measures to directly make objective evaluations and decisions have greatly improved the efficiency of decision-making. Finally, we evaluated the comprehensive benefits of five water-saving measures in a published literature, and the results of the evaluation were compared with that of the TOPSIS-entropy-weighted decision-making method, and we found that the two results are in good agreement with each other, This study proved the reliability of the new method and provided guidance for the decision-makers to choose efficient water-saving measures according to local conditions.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭