• ▶ 2008-2024年被中国情报信息研究所评价中心评为“中国科技核心期刊”
  • ▶ 2019-2024年连续三届被中国科学院文献情报中心中国科学引文数据库CSCD(核心库)收录
  • ▶ 2021、2023年入编北京大学图书馆《中文核心期刊要目总览》
  • ▶ 2020-2024连续四年入选《科技期刊世界影响力指数(WJCI)报告》
海 霞, 李伟峰, 韩立建.京津冀城市群城乡生活用水效率差异分析水资源与水工程学报[J].,2018,29(2):27-33
京津冀城市群城乡生活用水效率差异分析
Study on the domestic water use efficiency between urban and rural areas of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration, China
  
DOI:10.11705/j.issn.1672-643X.2018.02.05
中文关键词:  用水效率  城乡生活用水  脱钩理论  京津冀城市群
英文关键词:water use efficiency  urban and rural domestic water  decoupling theories  Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(41590841); 国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC0505701); 中国科学院前沿项目(QYZDB-SSW-DQC034)
作者单位
海 霞1,2, 李伟峰1, 韩立建1 (1.中国科学院生态环境研究中心 城市与区域国家重点实验室北京 100085 2.中国科学院大学 北京 100049) 
摘要点击次数: 2555
全文下载次数: 940
中文摘要:
      京津冀城市群高度密集连片的人类活动致使区域水资源短缺问题越来越严重,随着区域生活质量的普遍提升,生活用水比重不断增加,其对区域水资源综合利用效率的影响越来越大。城市群不均衡的发展模式不仅体现在不同城市之间生活用水方式存在差异,也体现在城乡之间的差异。结合Tapio脱钩方法,从城市与城市及城市与周边相互影响的角度,分析了京津冀城市群2001-2015年城乡生活用水及其效率时空变化规律。主要结论为:城乡生活用水规模存在明显差异,城乡生活用水总量比例为7∶3,城乡人均生活用水比例为3∶1,时间尺度上的变化呈现为城镇生活用水量增长,而农村生活用水量下降的趋势;城乡生活用水效率有明显差异,除北京外,其他城市农村生活用水效率普遍高于城镇;时间尺度上的变化特征表明,城镇生活用水效率不断提高并相对稳定,而农村生活用水效率则先提高后降低;京津冀生活用水效率的综合提高,不仅考虑每个城市自身的发展需要,更需要从城市与城市及城市与周边联动协调的角度制定科学合理的用水方案,从而更好地服务于京津冀一体化和水资源可持续利用。
英文摘要:
      The highly intensive and contiguous human activities of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration (BTH) of China pose more pressure on the problem of water shortage. With the improvement of life quality, the domestic water demand obviously rises, and has more impacts on the regional water use efficiency. However, the unbalanced regional development pattern leads to the difference of domestic water use efficiency not only between cities but also between urban and rural areas. In this study, we used the Tapio decoupling method to substantially analyze the spatial-temporal variation of the domestic water use and its efficiency of urban and rural areas of BTH based the long series of data from 2001 to 2015 from the perspective of the interaction between city and city and between city and its surroundings. We found: there existed obvious difference on the amount of domestic water use between urban and rural areas. The proportion of water consumption in urban and rural areas was 7∶3, and the proportion of water consumption per capita in urban and rural areas was 3∶1. In addition, the domestic water consumption of urban area was increasing over time while that was declining in rural area. There existed significant difference on the domestic water use efficiency between urban and rural areas. Except Beijing, the domestic water consumption of rural areas of the other cities was higher than that of urban areas. Moreover, the domestic water consumption efficiency of urban areas continuously improved at the early period, then reached the stable status. By contrast, the rural domestic water consumption increased firstly and then reduced. Our finding highlights that it is important to comprehensively consider the relation of different cities and their surrounding areas over regional scale to substantially improve the overall water use efficiency of BTH.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭