• ▶ 2008-2024年被中国情报信息研究所评价中心评为“中国科技核心期刊”
  • ▶ 2019-2024年连续三届被中国科学院文献情报中心中国科学引文数据库CSCD(核心库)收录
  • ▶ 2021、2023年入编北京大学图书馆《中文核心期刊要目总览》
  • ▶ 2020-2024连续四年入选《科技期刊世界影响力指数(WJCI)报告》
饶均辉.GSA-PP模型在区域水资源承载力评价中的应用水资源与水工程学报[J].,2016,27(6):95-100
GSA-PP模型在区域水资源承载力评价中的应用
Application of GSA-PP model in water resources carrying capacity evaluation
  
DOI:10.11705/j.issn.1672-643X.2016.06.17
中文关键词:  水资源承载力  指标体系  投影寻踪  引力搜索算法  文山州
英文关键词:water resources carrying capacity  index system  projection pursuit  gravitational search algorithm  Wenshan
基金项目:
作者单位
饶均辉 (云南省水文水资源局文山分局 云南 文山 663000) 
摘要点击次数: 2390
全文下载次数: 1160
中文摘要:
      为研究引力搜索算法(GSA)-投影寻踪(PP)模型应用于区域水资源承载力评价中的有效性和可行性。从水资源系统、经济社会系统和水环境系统遴选14个指标构建区域水资源承载力评价指标体系及分级标准,利用GSA算法优化PP模型最佳投影方向,提出GSA-PP水资源承载力评价模型,并构建粒子群优化(PSO)算法、差分进化(DE)算法和布谷鸟搜索(CS)算法优化的PP模型作对比,以文山州8县市水资源承载力评价为例进行实例研究。结果表明:GSA算法连续10次优化PP模型获得的适应度值均为1147.9363,均优于PSO、DE和HS算法,具有较高的求解精度和稳定性能。GSA-PP模型对麻栗坡县、马关县和文山市的评价结果为“可承载”,对其余5县的评价结果为“基本可承载”。GSA-PP模型对实例评价及排序结果与DE-PP模型相同;与PSO-PP、CS-PP模型评价结果相同,但在排序上存在差异。实例验证了智能算法求解精度的高低决定着评价效果的优劣。
英文摘要:
      In order to study the effectiveness and feasibility of the gravitational search algorithm (GSA) - Projection Pursuit (PP) model applying to evaluate the carrying capacity of water resources, the regional water resources carrying capacity evaluation index system and classification standards were constructed by selecting 14 indicators from the water system, economic and social system, and water environmental system, the best projection direction was optimized using GSA algorithm, and the GSA-PP evaluation model for water resources carrying capacity was also proposed, then the PP models established by particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm, differential evolution (DE) algorithm and cuckoo search (CS) algorithm optimization were respectively compared with the GSA-PP model, finally the water resources carrying capacity in 8 Wenshan counties was evaluated as case studies. The results showed that the fitness value of 10 consecutive optimizations by GSA algorithm is 1147.9363, they were all better than algorithms of PSO, DE and HS, it has higher solution accuracy and stable performance. The evaluation results of GSA-PP model in Malipo County, Maguan County and Wenshan city were“may carrying capacity”, the evaluation results of the remaining five counties as “basically may carrying capacity”. The evaluated and sorted results of GSA-PP were similar to the DE-PP model; and the evaluation results of GSA-PP were also same as PSO-PP and CS-PP model, but there were differences in the sorted results. Therefore, the solution accuracy of the intelligent algorithm determines the pros and cons of evaluation effects.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭