• ▶ 2008-2024年被中国情报信息研究所评价中心评为“中国科技核心期刊”
  • ▶ 2019-2024年连续三届被中国科学院文献情报中心中国科学引文数据库CSCD(核心库)收录
  • ▶ 2021、2023年入编北京大学图书馆《中文核心期刊要目总览》
  • ▶ 2020-2024连续四年入选《科技期刊世界影响力指数(WJCI)报告》
张小毛, 陈维芳, 晏长成, 张敬会, 王伟亚.液相还原和碳热法制备纳米零价铁/活性炭复合材料的比较研究水资源与水工程学报[J].,2015,26(3):129-135
液相还原和碳热法制备纳米零价铁/活性炭复合材料的比较研究
Comparative study on synthesis of nano zero-valent iron/activated carbon produced by liquid reduction and carbonthermal treatment
  
DOI:10.11705/j.issn.1672-643X.2015.03.027
中文关键词:  纳米零价铁  活性炭  液相还原法  碳热法  六氯苯去除
英文关键词:nano zero-valent iron  activated carbon  liquid reduction  carbothermal treament  hexachlorobenzene removal
基金项目:上海市自然科学基金项目(14ZR1428900); 上海市科委能力建设项目 (13230502300); 教育部留学回国科研启动基金(SEM2013); 上海市研究生创新基金项目( JWCXSL1402)
作者单位
张小毛, 陈维芳, 晏长成, 张敬会, 王伟亚 (上海理工大学 环境与建筑学院 上海 200093) 
摘要点击次数: 2497
全文下载次数: 880
中文摘要:
      采用液相还原法和碳热法制备纳米零价铁/活性炭复合材料,目的是为了比较不同合成方法对材料的物化性质和脱氯能力的影响。随着铁的加载,合成材料的比表面积和孔容与未改性活性炭相比均有所减小。经还原沉淀法和碳热法合成后的纳米零价铁/活性炭复合材料的含铁量分别为12.85和16.73 mg/g。 从扫描电镜图像可以看出碳热法还原产生的纳米零价铁颗粒尺寸要比还原沉淀法略大且分散度也更好。 两种方法合成的纳米零价铁/活性炭对六氯苯均有良好去除效果。 经8 h接触后,去除率达到90%以上。 动力学研究表明:六氯苯的去除符合二级动力学。 另外六氯苯的去除是由于活性炭的吸附和零价铁的脱氯,近一半六氯苯被脱氯形成毒性较低的三氯苯或四氯苯。 碳热法合成的材料总的六氯苯的去除能力,反应速率和脱氯能力均要略高于液相还原。
英文摘要:
      The paper employed liquid reduction and carbothermal methods to synthesize nano zero-valent/activated carbon composites so as to compare the impact of different synthesis methods on products' physicochemical property and dechlorination capability.With the loading of iron, the surface area and pore volume of synthesis material decrease compared with unchecked activated carbon.The iron rate of materials synthesized from liquid reduction and carbotherml method is about 12.85 and 16.73 mg/g respectively. TEM images showed that the size of nano zero-valent iron particles produced from carbotherm reduction is greater than those from liquid reduction and better dispersed.Both materials synthesized by two methods have good removal effect to hexachlorobenzene. Removal rate reaches more than 90% after contact of 8 hours. Kinetics study further revealed that hexachlorobenzene removal fits the pseudo-second order reaction well. The removal of hexachlorobenzene result from both adsorption by activated carbon and dechlorination by zero valent iron. About half of the initial hexachlorobenzene is dechlorinated to trichlorobenzene or tetrachlorobenzene.Overall,the performance of the material synthesized by carbothermal treatment is better than that synthesized by liquid reduction in light of removal efficiency, reaction rate and dechloriantion capability.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭