文章摘要
王 元, 李 琳, 穆卓昀.立柱排布方式对悬沙排沙漏斗水沙分离性能的影响Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering[J].,2021,32(6):152-158
立柱排布方式对悬沙排沙漏斗水沙分离性能的影响
Influence of column arrangement on water-sediment separation performance of the vortex settling basin
  
DOI:10.11705/j.issn.1672-643X.2021.06.20
中文关键词: 排沙漏斗  溢流悬板  双排立柱  排布方式  水沙分离性能  物理模型试验
英文关键词: vortex settling basin  suspension deflector  double row column  column arrangement  water sediment separation performance  physical model experiment
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(52069028); 自治区高校科研计划项目(XJEDU2018I010); 2018年天山青年计划项目(2018Q017)
Author NameAffiliation
WANG Yuan, LI Lin, MU Zhuoyun (1.新疆农业大学 水利与土木工程学院 新疆 乌鲁木齐 830052 2.新疆水利工程安全与水灾害防治重点实验室 新疆 乌鲁木齐 830052) 
Hits: 711
Download times: 230
中文摘要:
      为了获取立柱的排布方式对排沙漏斗水沙分离性能的影响规律,通过室内试验对进流量、含沙浓度不同时双排立柱并排布置和交错布置的排沙漏斗的水沙分离性能进行研究。结果表明:无立柱时漏斗悬板淤沙波痕峰值、底板淤沙冲沟的曲率和冲深均最大,立柱并排布置时次之,交错布置时各值均最小;与未加设立柱相比,并排布置排沙耗水率最大增加4.01%,交错布置排沙耗水率最大增加4.25%,加设立柱后漏斗室内的切向流速、螺旋流强度和二次流强度及范围均减小,交错布置相对于并排布置削弱更为明显。并排布置的室内淤沙质量比交错布置减少3.10%~4.76%,底孔排沙率增大0.90%~1.23%。工程设计时,考虑到立柱并排布置时的底板淤积量、底孔排沙率、泥沙总截除率和排沙耗水率与不加立柱时较为接近,故可按照并排方式布置立柱。研究成果可为排沙漏斗悬板支撑系统的优化设计提供参考。
英文摘要:
      In order to investigate the influence of supporting column arrangement on the water-sediment separation performance of the vortex settling basin (VSB), laboratory tests were carried out on the VSBs with two rows of supporting columns which were arranged differently including side-by-side arrangement and staggered arrangement under different inlet flows and sediment concentrations. The results showed that the peak of silt and sand ripple on the VSB suspension deflector, the curvature and depth of bottom silt gully were the largest when there were no columns, followed by the side-by-side column arrangement, and the staggered arrangement produced the smallest values. Compared with no columns, the water consumption rate of side-by-side arrangement increased by 4.01% to the maximum, and that of the staggered arrangement increased by 4.25%. The installment of the columns reduced the tangential flow rate, spiral strength and secondary flow intensity and range of the VSB, with a stronger reducing effect seen in staggered arrangement. However, the indoor sediment mass of side-by-side arrangement was 3.10%-4.76% less than that of staggered arrangement, and the sediment discharge rate of its bottom hole was 0.90%-1.23% higher. Therefore, side-by-side arrangement is recommended in engineering design because the floor silting amount, bottom hole discharge rate, total sediment removal rate and sand discharge water consumption rate of this arrangement are close to those of no columns. The research results are expected to provide a reference for the optimal design of the suspension deflector support system of VSBs.
View Full Text   View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close
function PdfOpen(url){ var win="toolbar=no,location=no,directories=no,status=yes,menubar=yes,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes"; window.open(url,"",win); } function openWin(url,w,h){ var win="toolbar=no,location=no,directories=no,status=no,menubar=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=no,width=" + w + ",height=" + h; controlWindow=window.open(url,"",win); } &et=22F1D5E3CC41362B334848DDD8D8F6CBC858BCD015E5B2DA1B319D80115C18CCA7FACC73D17D38F77330DB6D4CD81F79510034558C761881910C90D6EA77C573EA00589BA9AD5753A0D4352106C994BB61FAA522746568BD653289D17DD671D1EE50828556056485&pcid=5B3AB970F71A803DEACDC0559115BFCF0A068CD97DD29835&cid=3ECA06F115476E3F&jid=BC473CEDCB8CE70D7B12BDD8EA00FF44&yid=9475FABC7A03F4AB&aid=E76550361B5F502827C472B0C776F88F&vid=&iid=B31275AF3241DB2D&sid=04445C1D2BDA24EE&eid=4C100B7696CE9E24&fileno=20210620&flag=1&is_more=0">