文章摘要
陈丽丽, 莫淑红, 巩 瑶.基于Budyko弹性系数法的佳芦河流域径流变化归因识别Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering[J].,2021,32(1):110-116
基于Budyko弹性系数法的佳芦河流域径流变化归因识别
Attribution identification of runoff change in Jialu River Basin based on Budyko elastic coefficient method
  
DOI:10.11705/j.issn.1672-643X.2021.01.16
中文关键词: 径流变化  驱动因素  弹性系数法  佳芦河流域
英文关键词: runoff change  driving factor  elastic coefficient method  Jialu River Basin
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(51679185);陕西省创新人才推进计划项目科技创新团队(2018TD-037)
Author NameAffiliation
CHEN Lili1, MO Shuhong1, GONG Yao2 (1.西安理工大学 省部共建西北旱区生态水利国家重点实验室 陕西 西安 7100482.甘肃省水利水电勘测设计研究院有限责任公司 甘肃 兰州 730000) 
Hits: 1389
Download times: 496
中文摘要:
      气候变化和人类活动对径流的影响是一个综合过程,因此径流动态变化及其归因识别和定量表征对区域水资源开发管理至关重要。以佳芦河流域为研究区,选用Mann-Kendall趋势检验法、有序聚类法等分析了研究区水文要素的主要变化特征;采用基于Budyko水热耦合平衡理论的弹性系数法,定量分析了径流深变化对各驱动因素的响应程度。结果表明:研究时段内,降水量和潜在蒸散发量均无明显变化,但径流深呈显著减少趋势且在1978年发生突变,相比基准期,径流深相对变化率为-58.5%;人类活动和气候变化共同作用于该流域导致径流深锐减,其中人类活动、降水量和潜在蒸散发量对径流深变化的贡献率分别是77.54%、21.31%和1.15%。
英文摘要:
      Climate change and human activities comprehensively affect runoff processes, so the dynamic change of runoff along with its attribution identification and quantitative characterization are of great significance to the development and management of regional water resources. In this paper, taking Jialu River Basin as the study area, Mann-Kendall trend test and orderly clustering method were used to analyze the characteristics of the changes of hydrologic elements in the study area, and the elastic coefficient method based on Budyko water-energy balance equation was used to quantitatively analyze the response of runoff to each driving factor. The results showed that there was no significant change in precipitation and potential evapotranspiration, but the runoff showed a significant decreasing trend and an abrupt change occurred in 1978 with a relative change rate of -58.5% compared with the base period. Human activities and climate change together caused a sharp decrease in runoff in the basin, and the contribution rates of human activities, precipitation and potential evapotranspiration to runoff change were 77.54%, 21.31% and 1.15%, respectively.
View Full Text   View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close
function PdfOpen(url){ var win="toolbar=no,location=no,directories=no,status=yes,menubar=yes,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes"; window.open(url,"",win); } function openWin(url,w,h){ var win="toolbar=no,location=no,directories=no,status=no,menubar=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=no,width=" + w + ",height=" + h; controlWindow=window.open(url,"",win); } &et=848B4CF2B47654DBF72B9ED7A153E2070DE2CC7A61DF466B8D589053AB325D9B19DF53D132251954CE6AF355BD3C167177A819C338709493042DFC29EE5B6A96A2589E66498FEF2C0D935F10020C8F1BA7B8670F184390C5DDD83F9F7B85B1ED4FFF170AEFB7BC9A674BC4C81CF9ADAF&pcid=5B3AB970F71A803DEACDC0559115BFCF0A068CD97DD29835&cid=3ECA06F115476E3F&jid=BC473CEDCB8CE70D7B12BDD8EA00FF44&yid=9475FABC7A03F4AB&aid=BA84613CF2B53FC9150546ECCF6955B1&vid=&iid=CA4FD0336C81A37A&sid=4DB1E72614E68564&eid=8477411EEDB08A86&fileno=20210116&flag=1&is_more=0">