文章摘要
王 琳, 毛海涛, 严新军, 黄 风, 林 荣.平原水库“防-截-导”渗流控制对坝后地下水位的影响Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering[J].,2020,31(3):254-260
平原水库“防-截-导”渗流控制对坝后地下水位的影响
Influence of “prevention-interception-diversion” seepage control method on the groundwater level in the downstream area of a plain reservoir dam
  
DOI:10.11705/j.issn.1672-643X.2020.03.37
中文关键词: 地下水  土壤盐渍化  防渗体  截渗沟  导渗
英文关键词: groundwater  soil salinization  impervious body  interception ditch  seepage diversion
基金项目:2018-2019年自治区研究生科研创新项目(XJ2019G172); 国家自然科学基金项目(51309262); 重庆市科委基础与前沿研究计划项目(cstc2018jcyjAX0673); 重庆市教委2011协同创新子课题(061500911)
Author NameAffiliation
WANG Lin1, MAO Haitao1,2, YAN Xinjun1, HUANG Feng1, LIN Rong3 (1.新疆农业大学 水利与土木工程学院 新疆 乌鲁木齐 830052 2.河北工程大学 水利水电学院河北 邯郸 056002 3.巫溪县后溪河水电开发有限公司 重庆 405800) 
Hits: 915
Download times: 520
中文摘要:
      针对干旱区平原水库渗漏引起的坝后土壤盐渍化问题,基于非饱和渗流理论,以恰拉水库坝后农田地下水位埋深为研究对象,采用数值模拟的方法研究了平原水库“防-截-导”渗流控制对坝后地下水埋深的影响。从防渗措施,截渗沟深度,截渗沟内积水排导情况等方面对比分析。结果表明:截渗沟深度与截渗沟积水深度的变化都会影响坝后农田地下水埋深,截渗沟越深,沟内积水深度越小对降低下游地下水位越有利。在“截渗-导渗”的联合作用下,确定无防渗措施、水平铺盖、垂直防渗墙3种工况下联合截渗沟最适深度分别为4.5、4.5、3.5 m。其中垂直防渗结合“截渗-导渗”的作用效果最佳,是无防渗措施条件下的1.16~1.30倍,是水平铺盖措施条件下的1.15~1.21倍。可见“防-截-导”的综合控渗机制可有效控制下游的渗流量从而降低坝后农田地下水位,防止坝后农田土壤盐渍化的发生,治理下游的生态环境。
英文摘要:
      To help solve the soil salinization problem of the dam downstream area caused by reservoir leakage in plain arid areas, we studied the buried depth of the farmland underground water level in the downstream area of the Qiala Reservoir dam based on the unsaturated seepage theory, as well as the influence of“prevention-interception-diversion” seepage control method on the buried depth using numerical simulation. The results showed that the change of the depth and the water collecting depth of the interception ditch could affect the groundwater buried depth of the farmland in the downstream area of the dam. Under the combined action of “prevention-interception-diversion”, the optimal depths of the interception ditches were determined to be 4.5 m, 4.5 m and 3.5 m, respectively under the three working conditions of no seepage control measures, horizontal bedding and vertical cut-off wall. Among them, the effect of the vertical cut-off wall combined with “interception-diversion” method performed the best, which was 1.16-1.30 times of no seepage control measures, and 1.15-1.21 times of horizontal bedding measures. It can be seen that the comprehensive seepage control mechanism of “prevention-interception-diversion” can effectively control the seepage flow in the downstream so as to reduce the farmland underground water level, prevent the farmland soil salinization, and control the downstream ecological environment.
View Full Text   View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close
function PdfOpen(url){ var win="toolbar=no,location=no,directories=no,status=yes,menubar=yes,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes"; window.open(url,"",win); } function openWin(url,w,h){ var win="toolbar=no,location=no,directories=no,status=no,menubar=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=no,width=" + w + ",height=" + h; controlWindow=window.open(url,"",win); } &et=22F1D5E3CC41362B4173BDF0EC146E7D15D75F6E6E6E21E717552E887C43187B4327F45D15B9A1B3A7FE5ED93A76EDB698015E3C2AA131809653ECEFDFC66A76FF251C615BAAC1701A256A827481218C021BA0C891365CFDB55B72BD01BD97227DC0518482C4DD6E403123A68B33C036D424D2E93157EEAF9A21F3305D0FC1D3B008117FB0027C1D3A523068D6A4DDFDC2506A084AD1792E&pcid=5B3AB970F71A803DEACDC0559115BFCF0A068CD97DD29835&cid=3ECA06F115476E3F&jid=BC473CEDCB8CE70D7B12BDD8EA00FF44&yid=0D1D160AB8016934&aid=47415C07092E978CAC4179E82701E975&vid=&iid=38B194292C032A66&sid=01622E3E475F966C&eid=89AC6B0ADBEA2741&fileno=20200337&flag=1&is_more=0">