文章摘要
侯 伟, 陈 燕, 孙韶华, 李 祥, 李 伟, 胡 芳, 赵清华, 贾瑞宝.黄河下游典型水库浮游植物群落结构及其与环境因子的关系Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering[J].,2018,29(2):62-68
黄河下游典型水库浮游植物群落结构及其与环境因子的关系
Phytoplankton community dynamics and its relationship with key environmental factors in typical reservoirs, lower reaches of Yellow River
  
DOI:10.11705/j.issn.1672-643X.2018.02.11
中文关键词: 山区水库  引黄水库  浮游植物  营养盐  藻类  生态环境
英文关键词: mountainous reservoir  Yellow River reservoir  phytoplankton  nutrent  algae  ecological environment
基金项目:国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项课题(2012ZX07404-003); 国家科技惠民工程项目(2013GS370202); “饮用水安全保障技术”泰山学者建设工程专项(ts200640025); 山东省自然科学青年基金项目(ZR2014EEQ006)
Author NameAffiliation
HOU Wei, CHEN Yan, SUN Shaohua, LI Xiang, LI Wei, HU Fang, ZHAO Qinghua, JIA Ruibao (山东省城市供排水监测中心 山东 济南 250021) 
Hits: 2110
Download times: 891
中文摘要:
      为发现浮游植物群落结构在黄河下游地区典型水库中的时空变化及其与环境因子的关系,了解两种山区与引黄水库浮游植物群落结构的差异,于2012年9月至2013年8月对黄河下游地区山区(卧虎山、锦绣川)和引黄(鹊山、玉清)水库浮游植物群落结构进行了调查研究。采样期间,共检出浮游植物55种属,以蓝藻、绿藻和硅藻门类群为主;常见属种包括脆杆藻属(Fragilaria Lyngbye)、浮丝藻属(Planktonema)、小环藻属(Cyclotella)、小球藻属(Chlorella)等。4座水库浮游植物丰度为42×104~ 4566×104 cells/L,季节差异较大,丰水期丰度明显高于其他两个时期,以卧虎山和鹊山水库丰度较高。统计分析显示,山区和引黄水库浮游植物丰度分别受TP、水温的限制,两种类型水库浮游植物群落结构的差异与水体来源及类型关系密切。将数据汇总进行主成分分析(PCA),结果表明:离子类型、营养状态、氮磷营养盐组成及水温是影响黄河下游地区山区与引黄水库浮游植物群落结构的主要因素。
英文摘要:
      To compare phytoplankton communities dynamics and their relationships with environmental factors in reservoirs located at lower recheas of Yellow River, the differences in phytoplankton community structure between the two mountainous regions and the Yellow River Reservoir were studied. A survey of water quality and phytoplankton communities of two mountainous (Wohushan and Jinxiuchuan) reservoirs and two Yellow River (Quesha and Yuqingn) reservoirs was carried out from September 2012 to August 2013 in Jinan City. Totally, 51 species of phytoplankton were identified, composed mainly of Chlorophyta, Cyanobacteria and Diotam, with common species of Fragilaria Lyngbye, Planktonema, Cyclotella and Chlorella. Phytoplankton abundance ranged from 42×104 cells/L to 4566×104 cells/L in four reservoirs, and the seasonal differences were significant. The abundance of the phytoplankton in wet season was significantly higher than that in the other two periods, with Wohushan and Queshan Reservoirs significantly higher than other reservoirs. Statistical analysis suggested that the abundance of phytoplankton was limited by total phosphorus and water temperature in mountainous and Yellow River reservoirs, respectively. The differences in phytoplankton community structures between mountainous and Yellow River reservoirs was bound with water sources and types. Principal component analysis(PCA)of summarized data indicated that ion species, trophic states, TN∶TP ratios and water temperature were the most important factors influencing phytoplnakton community structure in moutainous and Yellow River reservoirs.
View Full Text   View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close
function PdfOpen(url){ var win="toolbar=no,location=no,directories=no,status=yes,menubar=yes,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes"; window.open(url,"",win); } function openWin(url,w,h){ var win="toolbar=no,location=no,directories=no,status=no,menubar=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=no,width=" + w + ",height=" + h; controlWindow=window.open(url,"",win); } &et=ABF0E5C510E1AF892B9BAA4440ED91C35CFA6E00303971AB23638895FEBAD80FCB73AC5C43C51E999BD1FC30CD1183537A6D3EC5A53605DB2580F5E7CA8063D387A09B1E19B917FB1CB81E948AC9E2386DC769EB64748ACFC8F78B3441B04B3E4905F63D7D5DE0441DE4C8389C0C100A6ACEE43985B224B4937DF97D5B183C45113EA346A0E0CD0B03F848D21BF36AF4&pcid=5B3AB970F71A803DEACDC0559115BFCF0A068CD97DD29835&cid=3ECA06F115476E3F&jid=BC473CEDCB8CE70D7B12BDD8EA00FF44&yid=EA357AD73C8E13BC&aid=48B122D52A6E455296AC4DB38A77C35E&vid=&iid=0B39A22176CE99FB&sid=95D537AC89B28832&eid=68D88C2FCF9C3098&fileno=20180211&flag=1&is_more=0">