文章摘要
高洪福, 施春红, 张国照, 马方曙, 周北海.ABR处理农村生活污水填料选择的研究Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering[J].,2016,27(1):86-90
ABR处理农村生活污水填料选择的研究
Study on selection of packing for treatment of rural domestic sewage by anaerobic baffled reactors (ABR)
  
DOI:10.11705/j.issn.1672-643X.2016.01.15
中文关键词: 厌氧折流板反应器  农村生活污水  厌氧污水处理  水处理填料
英文关键词: anaerobic baffled reactor  rural domestic sewage  anaerobic sewage treatment  filler of water treatment
基金项目:
Author NameAffiliation
GAO Hongfu1, SHI Chunhong1, ZHANG Guozhao2, MA Fangshu1, ZHOU Beihai1 (1.北京科技大学 土木与环境工程学院北京 1000832.中节能水务发展有限公司北京 100082) 
Hits: 1990
Download times: 1003
中文摘要:
      采用厌氧折流板反应器(ABR)处理农村生活污水,并选择出适合农村生活污水处理的ABR填料。以立体弹性填料、纤维球填料和鲍尔环填料作为ABR填料,以无填料ABR为对照实验装置,考察了填料对ABR处理效果和生物相的影响,并对各填料ABR工程造价进行了分析。研究结果表明:装填立体弹性填料、纤维球填料和鲍尔环填料后,ABR对COD、SCOD和SS的去除率均有一定程度的提高;装填填料ABR中微生物种类和数量均多于无填料ABR;立体弹性填料的造价分别约为纤维球填料和鲍尔环填料的1/8和1/15。因此,立体弹性填料最适合作为ABR处理农村生活污水用填料,装置稳定后,出水COD、SCOD和SS的平均浓度分别为87.42、49.61和13.20 mg/L,平均去除率分别为59.04 %、60.05 %和84.12 %。
英文摘要:
      The paper used anaerobic baffled reactors (ABRs) to treat rural domestic sewage,and chose the suitable packing.Flexible three-dimensional packing,the pall ring packing and fiber ball packing was chosen as ABR packing, and used an ABR without packing as a contrastive reactor,and investigated influence of packing on the treatment and biofacies of ABR and, and also analyzed the construction cost of these ABRs.The results showed that after filling the flexible three-dimensional packing, pall ring packing and fiber ball packing, the removal rates of ABR to COD,SCOD and SS have certain increase. There were more microbial species and quantities in the three ABRs filled with packing than that without packing.The construction cost of the ABR filled with flexible three-dimensional packing is almost 1/8 of the ABR filled with pall ring packing,and 1/15 of the ABR filled with fiber ball packing. Therefore the flexible three-dimensional packing was the most suitable one to be added into ABR to treat rural domestic sewage.When the equipment is stable, the average concentrations of effluent COD, SCOD and SS are 87.42 mg/L, 49.61 mg/L and 13.20 mg/L respectively, and the average removal rates of COD, SCOD and SS are 59.04 %, 60.05 % and 84.12 % respectively.
View Full Text   View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close
function PdfOpen(url){ var win="toolbar=no,location=no,directories=no,status=yes,menubar=yes,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes"; window.open(url,"",win); } function openWin(url,w,h){ var win="toolbar=no,location=no,directories=no,status=no,menubar=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=no,width=" + w + ",height=" + h; controlWindow=window.open(url,"",win); } &et=08EE5A5866ACE440324C40A6768C28D6CB98BA56375F476A950D3C7726AD07E5BABB572DBCB74086CCE672FD9C9071884E9BD30EA89470DF28519E4A1AC71108580C866488CE0594D4C1F8E867D1B6C9E869D6C67362C081957311E3B221C63EA065113CE861A87896CCB6B42B122064&pcid=5B3AB970F71A803DEACDC0559115BFCF0A068CD97DD29835&cid=3ECA06F115476E3F&jid=BC473CEDCB8CE70D7B12BDD8EA00FF44&yid=9F915C6F01DE79C5&aid=68823192B3EBB96C6E6B0822C005F27D&vid=&iid=CA4FD0336C81A37A&sid=7AA74D31F1FF2DCE&eid=869807E2D7BED9EC&fileno=20160115&flag=1&is_more=0">