文章摘要
何小敏,杨 敏,董天松,刘 鹏,李 琳.白鹤滩水电站反拱型底板非线性静力分析Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering[J].,2013,24(1):40-44
白鹤滩水电站反拱型底板非线性静力分析
Nonlinear stability analysis of the counter-arched slabfor Baihetan hydropower project
Received:October 12, 2012  Revised:October 22, 2012
DOI:10.11705/j.issn.1672-643X.2013.01.009
中文关键词: 水垫塘  反拱形底板  稳定性  非线性  锚固  反拱曲率  键槽
英文关键词: plunge pool  counter-arched slab  stability  non-linear  anchoring level  reverse arch curvature  key groove
基金项目:国家自然科学基金面上项目资助(51179119) 
Author NameAffiliation
HE Xiaomin State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, Tianjin University,Tianjin 300072, China 
YANG Min State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, Tianjin University,Tianjin 300072, China 
DONG Tiansong State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, Tianjin University,Tianjin 300072, China 
LIU Peng Hydrochina Xibei Engineering Corporation, Xi''an 710065, China [KH*3D] 
LI Lin State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, Tianjin University,Tianjin 300072, China 
Hits: 1890
Download times: 934
中文摘要:
      基于非线性接触理论,结合有限元分析方法对弦长达到130m、分块较多的反拱底板水垫塘进行敏感性分析,研究正向荷载作用下不同锚固水平和方式、反拱曲率及键槽对反拱水垫塘稳定性的影响。并得出以下结论:锚筋对反拱形底板的整体稳定起关键性作用;均布荷载作用下锚筋均匀分布最利于整体稳定,中间板块不锚固是可以选择的利于成拱的方式;对于弦长达130m的反拱水垫塘,反拱圆心角74°左右较合理; 键槽对局部稳定性有明显提高。
英文摘要:
      Based on the nonlinear contact theory, combined with finite element analysis method ,this paper made sensitivity analysis of counter-arched slab whose chord length is 130m and which has more than 9blocks. It also studied the influence on the stability of the counter-arched slab under different anchor level and way, different reverse arch curvature and key groove. And it draw the following conclusion that anchor bar plays key role in counter-arched slab''s overall stability; uniform anchor bar distribution is the most suitable way for the overall stability and intermediate plate without anchor bar can be selected as a good way; for reverse- arch-shaped water cushion pond whose chord length up to 130m, the arch central angle about 74° is reasonable; the local stability has increased significantly by the influence of key groove.
View Full Text   View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close
function PdfOpen(url){ var win="toolbar=no,location=no,directories=no,status=yes,menubar=yes,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes"; window.open(url,"",win); } function openWin(url,w,h){ var win="toolbar=no,location=no,directories=no,status=no,menubar=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=no,width=" + w + ",height=" + h; controlWindow=window.open(url,"",win); } &et=1E24C25A86E5883F5B35BB5A3469429C3009CB29E7D1A01E6953937448D776701E4600C9D1F0FA0708375DDFA8243F8762146C98E00F8AAFBE10E82C90E5EF00AFC95734E3270B4667BDD67A123F479460BA5F477D69605B&pcid=5B3AB970F71A803DEACDC0559115BFCF0A068CD97DD29835&cid=3ECA06F115476E3F&jid=BC473CEDCB8CE70D7B12BDD8EA00FF44&yid=FF7AA908D58E97FA&aid=7E4BA23F4BE8A9D434A40609A8A103E7&vid=&iid=CA4FD0336C81A37A&sid=1371F55DA51B6E64&eid=1AE5323881A5ECDC&fileno=20130109&flag=1&is_more=0">