文章摘要
MEI Xing,SHEN Bing,MO Shuhong,YIN Ruhong,QIN Shengying.新疆和田与陕西西安的ET_O的比较Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering[J].,2011,22(6):
新疆和田与陕西西安的ET_O的比较
Comparison of ET_0 between Hotan and Xi'an
  
DOI:
中文关键词: ET0  ET0比较  气象因素  日照因素  和田地区  西安地区  
英文关键词: ET0  comparison of ET0  meteorological  sunshine  Hotan region  Xi'an region  
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(50939004)资助
Author NameAffiliation
MEI Xing,SHEN Bing,MO Shuhong,YIN Ruhong,QIN Shengying MEI Xing1,SHEN Bing1,MO Shuhong1,YIN Ruhong2,QIN Shengying3(1.Key Lab on Northwest Water Resources and Environment Ecology of MOE,Xi'an University of Technology,Xi'an 710048,China,2.Development and Reform Commission,Hotan 848000,3.Administration Bureau of the Hotan River,China) 
Hits: 1708
Download times: 2
中文摘要:
      对干旱区和半湿润区的参考作物蒸散量ET0进行比较。本文采用世界粮农组织(FAO)推荐的Penman-Monteith PM公式(1974)计算得到新疆和田和陕西西安站1956~2005年的逐日ET0序列。将逐日ET0序列统计得到月序列、季序列、年序列,分析了两站的年和四季ET0的长期变化及ET0的年内变化;对年和四季ET0量值进行了影响因素分析。和田和西安的ET0的年内变化和年际变化均呈下降趋势,但是和田的ET0下降趋势不显著,西安的ET0下降趋势显著;气象因素对和田和西安的ET0的影响是相似的,但是日照时数对和田地区的ET0影响比对西安地区的ET0影响弱。
英文摘要:
      
View Full Text   View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close
function PdfOpen(url){ var win="toolbar=no,location=no,directories=no,status=yes,menubar=yes,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes"; window.open(url,"",win); } function openWin(url,w,h){ var win="toolbar=no,location=no,directories=no,status=no,menubar=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=no,width=" + w + ",height=" + h; controlWindow=window.open(url,"",win); } &et=8C10CEA789A144B8963479ABC5E599B3964D5F2DA3C841178C4E0C434046A5582100983AA2B69421B7E808EC39445509&pcid=5B3AB970F71A803DEACDC0559115BFCF0A068CD97DD29835&cid=3ECA06F115476E3F&jid=BC473CEDCB8CE70D7B12BDD8EA00FF44&yid=9377ED8094509821&aid=99964277373&vid=&iid=B31275AF3241DB2D&sid=&eid=&fileno=201106239&flag=1&is_more=0">