• ▶ 2008-2024年被中国情报信息研究所评价中心评为“中国科技核心期刊”
  • ▶ 2019-2024年连续三届被中国科学院文献情报中心中国科学引文数据库CSCD(核心库)收录
  • ▶ 2021、2023年入编北京大学图书馆《中文核心期刊要目总览》
  • ▶ 2020-2024连续四年入选《科技期刊世界影响力指数(WJCI)报告》
黄显峰, 谭毅苗, 赵同强, 郭晓茜.基于组合赋权云模型的平原河网水量水质评价模型研究水资源与水工程学报[J].,2025,36(5):48-56
基于组合赋权云模型的平原河网水量水质评价模型研究
Water quality and quantity assessment of plain river etworks based on a combined weighting cloud model
  
DOI:10.11705/j.issn.1672-643X.2025.05.06
中文关键词:  平原河网  MIKE11  水动力水质数值模拟  评价指标体系  组合权重  云模型  方案评价
英文关键词:plain river network  MIKE11  hydrodynamic-water quality numerical simulation  evaluation index system  combined weighting  cloud model  scheme evaluation
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(520031111)
作者单位
黄显峰1, 谭毅苗1, 赵同强2, 郭晓茜1 (1.河海大学 水利水电学院 江苏 南京 210098 2.昆山市水务局 江苏 昆山 215300) 
摘要点击次数: 546
全文下载次数: 137
中文摘要:
      针对平原河网地区水质恶化问题,以昆山市高新区新江圩为例,首先构建水动力水质耦合模型,并提出基于组合赋权云模型的调度方案评价方法,制定不同调水方案,放入水动力水质模型中进行模拟研究,构建水质-水量评价指标体系;采用层次分析法求得主观权重以及熵权法和TOPSIS法求得客观权重,再利用博弈论纳什均衡手段求得各指标综合权重。对各指标进行评价等级范围划分,使用X条件云发生器求得等级隶属度,进行加权综合权重求和后得到各方案综合评价得分。评分按由高到低排名依次为方案五、方案七、方案三、方案四、方案六、方案二、方案一、初始调度方案,比选得到综合最优调度方案为调度方案五。采用本研究提出的方法优选出的方案能够在保证水质得以改善的同时,显著降低调水量,节约调度成本,可为平原区域通过调水改善水环境的研究提供参考。
英文摘要:
      To address the water quality deterioration in plain river network areas, a case study of river scheduling schemes was carried out for the Xinjiangwei area of Kunshan High-Tech Zone. A hydrodynamic-water quality coupled model was first established, and an evaluation method for scheduling schemes based on a combined weighting cloud model was proposed. Various water transfer schemes were developed and then simulated by the coupled model to construct a water quality-quantity evaluation index system. The subjective weights of the indices were determined by the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), while the objective weights were obtained through the entropy weight and TOPSIS. The comprehensive weights of each index were then calculated by Nash equilibrium theory in game theory. Subsequently, the indices were classified into different grades, and the X-conditional cloud generator was employed to determine the membership degree of each grade. The comprehensive evaluation scores of all schemes were obtained by weighted summation of the comprehensive weights. The schemes were ranked in descending order as follows: scheme 5, scheme 7, scheme 3, scheme 4, scheme 6, scheme 2, scheme 1, and the initial scheduling scheme. According to the comparative analysis, scheme 5 was identified as the optimal comprehensive scheduling scheme. This scheme can ensure water quality improvement while minimizing the water transfer volume, providing a reference for research on water environment improvement through water transfer in plain river network regions.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭